Paper detail

The Reach of Threshold-Corrected Dark QCD

We consider a recently-proposed model which posits the existence of composite dark matter, wherein dark "quarks" transforming as fundamentals under an $SU(3)_d$ gauge group undergo a confining phase and form dark baryons. The model attempts to explain both the $\mathcal{O}(1)$ relic density ratio, $Ω_{\mathrm{dark}}/Ω_{\mathrm{baryon}}\sim 5.4$, as well as the asymmetric production of both dark and baryonic matter via leptogenesis. Though the solution of $β$ functions for $SU(3)_c$ and $SU(3)_d$ constitutes the main drive of the model, no threshold corrections were taken into account as the renormalization scale crosses the mass threshold of the heavy new fields in the model. We extend this work by explicitly calculating the threshold-corrected renormalization-group flow for the theory using an effective-field matching technique. We find that the theory has a much wider range of applicability than previously thought, and that a significant fraction of models (defined by the number of fields contained therein) is able to account for the observed relic density.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.