Paper detail

The rationality about the assumption that the signal and decoy states are indistinguishable in decoy-state quantum key distribution

Decoy-state quantum key distribution (QKD) has become the most efficient method to resist the photon-number-splitting (PNS) attack and estimate the secure key rate. The decoy-state method has many assumptions, among which a critical one is that an eavesdropper (Eve) cannot distinguish between the signal and decoy states. However, a rigorous proof of the rationality about this assumption is not yet available so far. In fact, due to the difference of photon-number probability distribution between the signal and decoy states, Eve is able to distinguish the two states with a certain probability. In this work, we adopt the Bayesian decision to distinguish the signal and decoy states in one-decoy-state QKD, and perform different PNS attack strategies for the two states according to the previous decision. The numerical simulations indicate that the attack effect is not obvious or even failed. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the signal and decoy states are indistinguishable in decoy-state QKD. In addition, we also provide the method to set the intensities of signal and decoy states properly, which can not only reduce the preparation cost and improve the communication efficiency, but also avoid the attack from Eve using the intensity difference between the signal and decoy states.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.