Paper detail

The ratio of homology rank to hyperbolic volume, II

Under mild topological restrictions, we obtain new linear upper bounds for the dimension of the mod $p$ homology (for any prime $p$) of a finite-volume orientable hyperbolic $3$ manifold $M$ in terms of its volume. A surprising feature of the arguments in the paper is that they require an application of the Four Color Theorem. If $M$ is closed, and either (a) $π_1(M)$ has no subgroup isomorphic to the fundamental group of a closed, orientable surface of genus $2, 3$ or $4$, or (b) $p = 2$, and $M$ contains no (embedded, two-sided) incompressible surface of genus $2, 3$ or $4$, then $\text{dim}\, H_1(M;F_p) < 157.763 \cdot \text{vol}(M)$. If $M$ has one or more cusps, we get a very similar bound assuming that $π_1(M)$ has no subgroup isomorphic to the fundamental group of a closed, orientable surface of genus $g$ for $g = 2, \dots,8$. These results should be compared with those of our previous paper $The\ ratio\ of\ homology\ rank\ to\ hyperbolic\ volume,\ I$, in which we obtained a bound with a coefficient in the range of $168$ instead of $158$, without a restriction on surface subgroups or incompressible surfaces. In a future paper, using a much more involved argument, we expect to obtain bounds close to those given by the present paper without such a restriction. The arguments also give new linear upper bounds (with constant terms) for the rank of $π_1(M)$ in terms of $\text{vol}\,M$, assuming that either $π_1(M)$ is $9$-free, or $M$ is closed and $π_1(M)$ is $5$-free.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.