Paper detail

The Ratio of CO to Total Gas Mass in High Redshift Galaxies

Walter et al. (20012) have recently identified the J=6-5, 5-4, and 2-1 CO rotational emission lines, and [C_{II}] fine-structure emission line from the star-forming interstellar medium in the high-redshift submillimeter source HDF 850.1, at z = 5.183. We employ large velocity gradient (LVG) modeling to analyze the spectra of this source assuming the [C_{II}] and CO emissions originate from (i) separate unvirialized regions, (ii) separate virialized regions, (iii) uniformly mixed unvirialized region, and (iv) uniformly mixed virialized regions. We present the best fit set of parameters, including for each case the ratio $α$ between the total hydrogen/helium gas mass and the CO(1-0) line luminosity. We also present computations of the ratio of H_{2} mass to [C_{II}] line-luminosity for optically thin conditions, for a range of gas temperatures and densities, for direct conversion of [C_{II}] line-luminosities to "dark-H_{2}" masses. For HDF 850.1 we find that a model in which the CO and C^{+} are uniformly mixed in gas that is shielded from UV radiation, requires a cosmic-ray or X-ray ionization rate of $ζ\approx$ 10^{-13} s^{-1}, plausibly consistent with the large star-formation rate ($\sim$ 10^{3} M$_{\odot}$ yr^{-1}) observed in this source. Enforcing the cosmological constraint posed by the abundance of dark matter halos in the standard $Λ$CDM cosmology and taking into account other possible contributions to the total gas mass, we find that three of these four models are less likely at the 2$σ$ level. We conclude that modeling HDF 850.1's ISM as a collection of unvirialized molecular clouds with distinct CO and C^{+} layers, for which $α$ = 0.6 M$_{\odot}$ (K km s^{-1} pc^{2})^{-1} for the CO to H_{2} mass-to-luminosity ratio, (similar to the standard ULIRG value), is most consistent with the $Λ$CDM cosmology.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.