Paper detail

The radius of the rho meson determined from its decay constant

We present a unified model describing electroweak properties of the pi and rho mesons. Using a general method of relativistic parametrization of matrix elements of local operators, adjusted for the nondiagonal in total angular momentum case, we calculate the rho-meson lepton-decay constant f_rho using the same parameters of free constituent quarks that have ensured exclusively good results for the pi meson previously. The only free parameter, characterizing quark interactions, which include additional spin-spin contribution and hence differ from the $π$-meson case, is fixed by matching the decay constant to its experimental value. The mean square charge radius is calculated, <r^2_rho>=(0.56+-0.04) fm^2. This result verifies, for the rho-meson case, the conjecture of equality between electromagnetic and strong radii of hadrons tested previously for proton, pi and K mesons.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.