Paper detail

The radiative efficiency of relativistic jet and wind: A case study of GRB 070110

A rapidly spinning, strongly magnetized neutron star is invoked as the central engine for some Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), especially, the $"$internal plateau$"$ feature of X-ray afterglow. However, for these $"$internal plateau$"$ GRBs, how to produce their prompt emission remains an open question. Two different physical process have been proposed in the literature, (1) a new-born neutron star is surrounded by a hyper-accreting and neutrino cooling disk, the GRB jet can be powered by neutrino annihilation aligning the spin axis; (2) a differentially rotating millisecond pulsar was formed due to different angular velocity between the interior core and outer shell parts of the neutron star, which can power an episodic GRB jet. In this paper, by analyzing the data of one peculiar GRB 070110 (with internal plateau), we try to test which model being favored. By deriving the physical parameters of magnetar with observational data, the parameter regime for initial period ($P_{0\rm }$) and surface polar cap magnetic field ($B_{\rm p}$) of the central NS are $(0.96\sim 1.2 )~\rm ms$ and $(2.4\sim 3.7)\times 10^{14}~\rm G$, respectively. The radiative efficiency of prompt emission is about $η_γ \sim 6\%$. However, the radiative efficiency of internal plateau ($η_{\rm X}$) is larger than $31\%$ assuming the $M_{\rm NS}\sim1.4 M_{\odot}$ and $P_{0\rm }\sim1.2 ~\rm ms$. The clear difference between the radiation efficiencies of prompt emission and internal plateau implies that they maybe originated from different components (e.g. prompt emission from the relativistic jet powered by neutrino annihilation, while the internal plateau from the magnetic outflow wind).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.