Paper detail

The Radiative Efficiency of Hot Accretion Flows

Two significant progresses have been made in the past years on our understanding of hot accretion flows. One is that only a small fraction of accretion flow available at the outer boundary can finally falls onto the black hole while most of them is lost in outflow. Another one is that electrons may directly receive a large fraction of the viscously dissipated energy in the accretion flow, i.e, $δ\sim 0.1-0.5$. The radiative efficiency of hot accretion flow when these two progresses are taken into account has not been systematically studied and is the subject of the present paper. We consider two regimes of hot accretion model. One is the advection dominated accretion flows (ADAFs) which lie on low accretion rate regime, $\la 10α^2\ledd/c^2$; another being the luminous hot accretion flows (LHAFs) which lie above this accretion rate. For the latter, we assume that the accretion flow will has a two-phase structure above a certain accretion rate, and a simplification is adopted in our calculation of the dynamics. Our results indicate that the radiative efficiency of hot accretion flow increases with the accretion rate and is highly enhanced by the direct viscous heating to electrons compared to the previous case of $δ\ll 1$. When the accretion rate is high, the radiative efficiency of hot accretion flow is comparable to that of the standard thin disk. Fitting formulae of radiative efficiency as a function of accretion rate for various $δ$ values are presented.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.