Paper detail

The radial profile and flattening of the Milky Way's stellar halo to $\rm 80~$kpc from the SEGUE K-giant Survey

We characterise the radial density, metallicity and flattening profile of the Milky Way's stellar halo, based on the large sample of 1757 spectroscopically confirmed giant stars from SDSS/SEGUE-2 after excising stars that were algorithmically attributed to apparent halo substructure (including the Sagittarius stream). Compared to BHB stars or RR Lyrae, giants are more readily understood tracers of the overall halo star population, with less bias in age or metallicity. The well-characterized selection function of the sample enables forward modelling of those data, based on ellipsoidal stellar density models, $ν_* (R,z)$, with Einasto profiles and (broken) power laws for their radial dependence, combined with a model for the metallicity gradient and the flattening profile. Among models with constant flattening, these data are reasonably well fit by an Einasto profile of $n=3.1\pm 0.5$ with an effective radius $\rm r_{eff} = 15\pm2~$kpc and a flattening of $q=0.7\pm 0.02$; or comparably well by an equally flattened broken power-law, with radial slopes of $α_{in}=2.1\pm 0.3$ and $α_{out}=3.8\pm 0.1$, with a break-radius of $r_{break}=18\pm1$~kpc; this is largely consistent with earlier work. We find a modest, but significant metallicity gradient within the "outer" stellar halo, $\rm [Fe/H]$ decreasing outward. If we allow for a variable flattening $q = f(r_{GC} )$, we find the distribution of halo giants to be considerably more flattened at small radii, $q({\rm 10~kpc})\sim 0.57$, compared to $q(>30{\rm kpc})\sim 0.8$. Remarkably, the data are then very well fit by a single power-law of index $\rm \sim 4.2\pm0.1$ of the variable $r_q\equiv\sqrt{R^2+(z/q(r))^2}$. In this simple and better fitting model, there is a break in flattening at $\sim 20$~kpc, instead of a break in the radial density function.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.