Paper detail

The Rømer Delay and Mass Ratio of the sdB+dM Binary 2M 1938+4603 from Kepler Eclipse Timings

The eclipsing binary system 2M 1938+4603 consists of a pulsating hot subdwarf B star and a cool M dwarf companion in an effectively circular three-hour orbit. The light curve shows both primary and secondary eclipses, along with a strong reflection effect from the cool companion. Here we present constraints on the component masses and eccentricity derived from the Rømer delay of the secondary eclipse. Using six months of publicly-available Kepler photometry obtained in Short Cadence mode, we fit model profiles to the primary and secondary eclipses to measure their centroid values. We find that the secondary eclipse arrives on average 2.06 +/- 0.12 s after the midpoint between primary eclipses. Under the assumption of a circular orbit, we calculate from this time delay a mass ratio of q = 0.2691 +/- 0.0018 and individual masses of M_sd = 0.372 +/- 0.024 Msun and M_c = 0.1002 +/- 0.0065 Msun for the sdB and M dwarf, respectively. These results differ slightly from those of a previously-published light curve modeling solution; this difference, however, may be reconciled with a very small eccentricity, e cos ω ~ 0.00004. We also report an orbital period decrease of P-dot = (-1.23 +/- 0.07) x 10^-10.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.