Paper detail

The quotient Unimodular Vector group is nilpotent

Jose-Rao introduced and studied the Special Unimodular Vector group $SUm_r(R)$ and $EUm_r(R)$, its Elementary Unimodular Vector subgroup. They proved that for $r \geq 2$, $EUm_r(R)$ is a normal subgroup of $SUm_r(R)$. The Jose-Rao theorem says that the quotient Unimodular Vector group, $SUm_r(R)/EUm_r(R)$, for $r \geq 2$, is a subgroup of the orthogonal quotient group $SO_{2(r+1)}(R)/EO_{2(r + 1)}(R)$. The latter group is known to be nilpotent by the work of Hazrat-Vavilov, following methods of A. Bak; and so is the former. In this article we give a direct proof, following ideas of A. Bak, to show that the quotient Unimodular Vector group is nilpotent of class $\leq d = \dim(R)$. We also use the Quillen-Suslin theory, inspired by A. Bak's method, to prove that if $R = A[X]$, with $A$ a local ring, then the quotient Unimodular Vector group is abelian.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.