Paper detail

The quest for self-consistency in hydrogen-bond definitions

In the last decades several hydrogen-bond definitions were proposed by classical computer simulations. Aiming at validating their self-consistency on a wide range of conditions, here we present a comparative study of six among the most common hydrogen-bond definitions for temperatures ranging from 220K to 400K and six classical water models. Our results show that, in the interval of temperatures investigated, a generally weak agreement among definitions is present. Moreover, cutoff choice for geometrically based definitions depends on both temperature and water model. As such, analysis of the same water model at different temperatures as well as different water models at the same temperature would require the development of specific cutoff values. Interestingly, large discrepancies were found between two hydrogen-bond definitions which were recently introduced to improve on more conventional methods. Our results anticipate that a more universal way to characterize hydrogen-bonds in classical molecular systems is needed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.