Paper detail

The quenched mass portion of star-forming galaxies and the origin of the star formation sequence slope

Observationally, a massive disk galaxy can harbor a bulge component that is comparably inactive as a quiescent galaxy (QG). It has been speculated that the quenched component contained in star-forming galaxies (SFGs) is the reason why the star formation main sequence (MS) has a shallow slope at high masses. In this paper, we present a toy model to quantify the quenched mass portion of SFGs ($f_{\rm Q}$) at fixed stellar mass ($M_{\ast}$) and to reconcile the MS slopes both in the low and the high mass regimes. In this model, each SFG is composed by a star-forming plus a quenched component. The mass of the star-forming component ($M_{\rm SF}$) correlates with the star formation rate (SFR) following a relation SFR $\propto M_{\rm SF}^{α_{\rm SF}}$, where $α_{\rm SF}\sim 1.0$ . The quenched component contributes to the stellar mass but does not to the SFR. It is thus possible to quantify $f_{\rm Q}$ based on the departure of the observed MS slope $α$ from $α_{\rm SF}$. Adopting the redshift-dependent MS slope reported by \citet{Whitaker 2014}, we explore the evolution of the $f_{\rm Q}-M_{\ast}$ relations over $z=[0.5,2.5]$. We find that Milky-Way mass SFGs (with $M_{\ast}\approx 10^{10.7}M_{\odot}$) typically have a $f_{\rm Q}=30\%-40\%$ at $z\sim 2.25$, whereas this value rapidly rises up to $70\%-80\%$ at $z\sim 0.75$. The origin of an $α\sim 1.0$ MS slope seen in the low mass regime is also discussed. We argue for a scenario in which the majority of low mass SFGs stay in a "steady-stage" star formation phase. In this phase, the SFR is mainly regulated by stellar feedback and not significantly influenced by the quenching mechanisms, thus keeping roughly constant over cosmic time. This scenario successfully produces an $α\sim 1.0$ MS slope, as well as the observed MS evolution from $z=2.5$ to $z=0$ at low masses.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.