Paper detail

The quasispecies regime for the simple genetic algorithm with ranking selection

We study the simple genetic algorithm with a ranking selection mechanism (linear ranking or tournament). We denote by $\ell$ the length of the chromosomes, by $m$ the population size, by $p_C$ the crossover probability and by $p_M$ the mutation probability. We introduce a parameter $σ$, called the selection drift, which measures the selection intensity of the fittest chromosome. We show that the dynamics of the genetic algorithm depend in a critical way on the parameter $$π\,=\,σ(1-p_C)(1-p_M)^\ell\,.$$ If $π<1$, then the genetic algorithm operates in a disordered regime: an advantageous mutant disappears with probability larger than $1-1/m^β$, where $β$ is a positive exponent. If $π>1$, then the genetic algorithm operates in a quasispecies regime: an advantageous mutant invades a positive fraction of the population with probability larger than a constant $p^*$ (which does not depend on $m$). We estimate next the probability of the occurrence of a catastrophe (the whole population falls below a fitness level which was previously reached by a positive fraction of the population). The asymptotic results suggest the following rules: $π=σ(1-p_C)(1-p_M)^\ell$ should be slightly larger than $1$; $p_M$ should be of order $1/\ell$; $m$ should be larger than $\ell\ln\ell$; the running time should be of exponential order in $m$. The first condition requires that $ \ell p_M +p_C< \lnσ$. These conclusions must be taken with great care: they come from an asymptotic regime, and it is a formidable task to understand the relevance of this regime for a real-world problem. At least, we hope that these conclusions provide interesting guidelines for the practical implementation of the simple genetic algorithm.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.