Paper detail

The quadratic scalar radius of the pion and the mixed $π-K$ radius

We consider the quadratic scalar radius of the pion, $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>$, and the mixed $K-π$ scalar radius, $<r^2_{{\rm S},Kπ}>$. With respect to the second, we point out that the more recent (post-1974) experimental results in $K_{l3}$ decays imply a value, $<r^2_{{\rm S},Kπ}>=0.31\pm0.06 {\rm fm}^2$, which is about $2 σ$ above estimates based on chiral perturbation theory. On the other hand, we show that this value of $<r^2_{{\rm S},Kπ}>$ suggests the existence of a low mass S$\tfrac{1}{2}$ $Kπ$ resonance. With respect to $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>$, we contest the central value and accuracy of current evaluations, that give $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>=0.61\pm0.04 {\rm fm}^2$. Based on experiment, we find a robust lower bound of $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>\geq0.70\pm0.06 {\rm fm}^2$ and a reliable estimate, $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>=0.75\pm0.07 {\rm fm}^2$, where the error bars are attainable. This implies, in particular, that the chiral result for $<r^2_{{\rm S},π}>$ is $1.4 σ$ away from experiment. We also comment on implications about the chiral parameter $\bar{l}_4$, very likely substantially larger (and with larger errors) than usually assumed.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.