Paper detail

The $Q^2$ Dependence of the Sum Rules for Structure Functions of Polarized $e(μ)N$ Scattering

The nonperturbative $Q^2$- dependence of the sum rules for the structure functions of polarized $e(μ)N$ scattering is discussed. The determination of twist-4 corrections to the structure functions at high $Q^2$ by QCD sum rules is reviewed and critically analyzed. It is found that in the case of the Bjorken sum rule the twist-4 correction is small at $Q^2 > 5 GeV^2$ and does not influence the value of $α_s$ determined from this sum rule. However, the accuracy of the today experimental data is insufficient to reliably determine $α_s$ from the Bjorken sum rule. For the singlet sum rule -- $p+n$ -- the QCD sum rule gives only the order of magnitude of twist-4 correction. At low and intermediate $Q^2$ the model is presented which realizes a smooth connection of the Gerasimov-Drell-Hearn sum rules at $Q^2 = 0$ with the sum rules for $Γ_{p,n}(Q^2)$ at high $Q^2$. The model is in a good agreement with the experiment.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.