Paper detail

The puzzling early detection of low velocity 56Ni decay lines in SN 2014J: Hints of a compact remnant

We show that the low-velocity 56Ni decay lines detected earlier than expected in the type Ia SN 2014J find an explanation in the Quark-Nova Ia model which involves the thermonuclear explosion of a tidally disrupted sub-Chandrasekhar White Dwarf in a tight Neutron-Star-White-Dwarf binary system. The explosion is triggered by impact from the Quark-Nova ejecta on the WD material; the Quark-Nova is the explosive transition of the Neutron star to a Quark star triggered by accretion from a CO torus (the circularized WD material). The presence of a compact remnant (the Quark Star) provides: (i) an additional energy source (spin-down power) which allows us to fit the observed light-curve including the steep early rise; (ii) a central gravitational potential which slows down some of the 56Ni produced to velocities of a few 1000 km/s. In our model, the 56Ni decay lines become optically visible at ~20 days from explosion time in agreement with observations. We list predictions that can provide important tests for our model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.