Paper detail

The proper motion of stars in dwarf galaxies: distinguishing central density cusps from cores

We show that measuring the proper motion of ${\sim 2000}$ stars within a dwarf galaxy, with an uncertainty of 1 km/s at most, can establish whether the Dark Matter (DM) density profile of the dwarf has a central core or cusp. We derive these limits by building mock star catalogues similar to those expected from future astrometric {\it Theia}-like missions and including celestial coordinates, radial velocity and proper motion of the stars. The density field of the DM halo of the dwarf is sampled from an extended Navarro-Frank-White (eNWF) spherical model, whereas the number density distribution of the stars is a Plummer sphere. The velocity field of the stars is set according to the Jeans equations. A Monte Carlo Markov Chain algorithm applied to a sample of $N\gtrsim 2000$ stars returns unbiased estimates of the eNFW DM parameters within $10\%$ of the true values and with $1σ$ relative uncertainties $\lesssim 20$\%. The proper motions of the stars lift the degeneracy among the eNFW parameters which appears when the line-of-sight velocities alone are available. {Our analysis demonstrates that, by estimating the log-slope of the mass density profile estimated at the half-light radius, a sample of $N=2000$ stars can distinguish between a core and a cusp at more than $8σ$.} Proper motions also return unbiased estimates of the dwarf mass profile with $1σ$ uncertainties that decrease, on average, from 2.65 dex to 0.15 dex when the size of the star sample increases from $N=100$ to $N=6000$ stars. The measure of the proper motions can thus strongly constrain the distribution of DM in nearby dwarfs and provides a fundamental contribution to understanding the nature and the properties of DM.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.