Paper detail

The Promise and Limitations of Precision Gravity: Application to the Interior Structure of Uranus and Neptune

We study the constraining power of a high-precision measurement of the gravity field for Uranus and Neptune, as could be delivered by a low periapse orbiter. Our study is practical, assessing the possible deliverables and limitations of such a mission with respect to the structure of the planets. Our study is also academic, assessing in a general way the relative importance of the low order gravity, high order gravity, rotation rate, and moment of inertia (MOI) in constraining planetary structure. We attempt to explore all possible interior density structures of a planet that are consistent with hypothetical gravity data, via MCMC sampling of parameterized density profiles. When the gravity field is poorly known, as it is today, uncertainties in the rotation rate on the order of 10 minutes are unimportant, as they are interchangeable with uncertainties in the gravity coefficients. By the same token, when the gravity field is precisely determined the rotation rate must be known to comparable precision. When gravity and rotation are well known the MOI becomes well-constrained, limiting the usefulness of independent MOI determinations unless they are extraordinarily precise. For Uranus and Neptune, density profiles can be well-constrained. However, the non-uniqueness of the relative roles of H/He, watery volatiles, and rock in the deep interior will still persist with high-precision gravity data. Nevertheless, the locations and magnitudes (in pressure-space) of any large-scale composition gradient regions can likely be identified, offering a crucially better picture of the interiors of Uranus or Neptune.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.