Paper detail

The process matrix framework for a single-party system

The process matrix framework [O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and C. Brukner, Nature Communications {\bf3}, 1092 (2012)] can describe general physical theory where locally operations are described by completely-positive maps but globally no fixed causal structure is assumed. In this framework, two parties who perform measurements on each single-qubit system can violate a "causal inequality", which is not violated if the global fixed causal structure exists. Since the standard quantum physics assumes a fixed global causal structure, the process matrix framework can describe more general physical theory than the standard quantum physics. In this paper, we show that for a single-party system the process matrix framework is reduced to the standard quantum physics, and therefore no exotic effect beyond the standard quantum physics can be observed. This result is analogous to the well known fact in the Bell inequality violation: a single-party system can be described by a local hidden variable theory, whereas more than two parties can violate the Bell inequality.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.