Paper detail

The problem of minimal resistance for functions and domains

Here we solve the problem posed by Comte and Lachand-Robert in (2001). Take a bounded domain Ωin R^2 and a piecewise smooth non-positive function u : \barΩ \to R vanishing on the boundary of Ω. Consider a flow of point particles falling vertically down and reflected elastically from the graph of u. It is assumed that each particle is reflected no more than once (no multiple reflections are allowed); then the resistance of the graph to the flow is expressed as F(u;Ω) = \frac{1}{|Ω|} \int_Ω(1 + |\nabla u(x)|^2)^{-1} dx. It is required to find \inf_{Ω,u} F(u;Ω). One can easily see that |\nabla u(x)| < 1 for all regular x \in Ω, and therefore one always has F(u;Ω) > 1/2. We prove that the infimum of F is exactly 1/2. This result is somewhat paradoxical, and the proof is inspired by, and is partly similar to, the paradoxical solution given by Besicovitch to the Kakeya problem.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.