Paper detail

The probability of double-strand breaks in giant DNA decreases markedly as the DNA concentration increases

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent a serious source of damage for all living things and thus there have been many quantitative studies of DSBs both in vivo and in vitro. Despite this fact, the processes that lead to their production have not yet been clearly understood, and there is no established theory that can account for the statistics of their production, in particular, the number of DSBs per base pair per unit Gy, here denoted by P1, which is the most important parameter for evaluating the degree of risk posed by DSBs. Here, using the single-molecule observation method with giant DNA molecules (166 kbp), we evaluate the number of DSBs caused by gamma-ray irradiation. We find that P1 is nearly inversely proportional to the DNA concentration above a certain threshold DNA concentration. A simple model that accounts for the marked decrease of P1 shows that it is necessary to consider the characteristics of giant DNA molecules as semiflexible polymers to interpret the intrinsic mechanism of DSBs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.