Paper detail

The primordial information content of Rayleigh Anisotropies

Anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are primarily generated by Thomson scattering of photons by free electrons. Around recombination, the Thomson scattering probability quickly diminishes as the free electrons combine with protons to form neutral hydrogen off which CMB photons can scatter through Rayleigh scattering. Unlike Thomson scattering, Rayleigh scattering is frequency dependent resulting in the generation of anisotropies with a different spectral dependence. Unfortunately the Rayleigh scattering efficiency rapidly decreases with the expansion of the neutral universe, with the result that only a small percentage of photons are scattered by neutral hydrogen. Although the effect is very small, future CMB missions with higher sensitivity and improved frequency coverage are poised to measure Rayleigh scattering signal. The uncorrelated component of the Rayleigh anisotropies contains unique information on the primordial perturbations that could potentially be leveraged to expand our knowledge of the early universe. In this paper we explore whether measurements of Rayleigh scattering anisotropies can be used to constrain primordial non-Gaussianity (NG) and examine the hints of anomalies found by WMAP and \textit{Planck} satellites. We show that the additional Rayleigh information has the potential to improve primordial NG constraints by $30\%$, or more. Primordial bispectra that are not of the local type benefit the most from these additional scatterings, which we attribute to the different scale dependence of the Rayleigh anisotropies. Unfortunately this different scaling means that Rayleigh measurements can not be used to constrain anomalies or features on large scales. On the other hand, anomalies that may persist to smaller scales, such as the potential power asymmetry seen in WMAP and \textit{Planck}, could be improved by the addition of Rayleigh measurements.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.