Paper detail

The Preon Sector of the SLq(2) (Knot) Model

We describe a Lagrangian defining the preon sector of the knot model. The preons are the elements of the fundamental representation of SLq(2), and unexpectedly agree with the preons conjectured by Harari and by Shupe. The leptons, neutrinos, up and down quarks, described as $j=3/2$ representations, and the electroweak vectors, described as $j=3$ representations, of SLq(2) also have the preon composition required by the schemes of Harari and of Shupe. The coupling constants and masses required by the preon Lagrangian introduce form factors that are simple functions of the knot model parameters. As previously shown the knot model has similarly provided a possible parametrization of the masses and electroweak coupling constants (Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix) of the standard model. There is an alternative formulation of the kinematics permitting possible additional isotopic partners of the quarks and the neutrinos.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.