Paper detail

The preferred direction of infalling satellite galaxies in the Local Group

Using a high resolution DM simulation of the Local Group (LG), conducted within the framework of the Constrained Local UniversE Simulation (CLUES) project, we investigate the nature of how satellites of the MW and M31 are accreted. Satellites of these galaxies are accreted anisotropically, entering the virial radius of their hosts from specific "spots" with respect to the large scale structure. Furthermore, material which is tidally stripped from these satellites is also, at z=0, distributed anisotropically and is characterized by an ellipsoidal sub-volume embedded in the halo. The angular pattern created by the locus of satellite infall points and the projected stripped DM is investigated within a coordinate system determined by the location of the LG companion and the simulated Virgo cluster across concentric shells ranging from 0.1 to 5 r_vir. Remarkably, the principal axis of the ellipsoidal sub-volume shows a coherent alignment extending from well within the halo to a few r_vir. A spherical harmonics transform applied to the angular distributions confirms the visual impression: namely, the angular distributions of both the satellites entry points and stripped DM is dominated by the l=2 quadrupole term, whose major principal axis is aligned across the shells considered. It follows that the structure of the outer (r>0.5 r_vir) regions of the main halos is closely related to the cosmic web within which it is embedded. Given the hypothesis that a large fraction of the stellar halo of the Milky Way has been accreted from satellites, the present results can be applied to the stellar halo of the MW and M31. We predict that the remnants of tidally stripped satellites should be embedded in streams of material composed of dark matter and stars. The present results can therefore shed light on the existence of satellites embedded within larger streams of matter, such as the Segue 2 satellite.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.