Paper detail

The potential of X-ray cluster surveys to constrain primordial non-Gaussianity

We present forecasts for constraints on deviations from Gaussian distribution of primordial density perturbations from future X-ray surveys of galaxy clusters. Our analysis is based on computing the Fisher-Matrix for number counts and large-scale power spectrum of clusters. We consider a survey with high-sensitivity and wide-area to detect about 2.5 x 10^5 extended sources. Based on the self-calibration approach, and including Planck priors in our analysis, we constrain 9 cosmological parameters and 4 nuisance parameters, which define the relation between cluster mass and X-ray flux. Because of the scale dependence of large-scale bias induced by local-shape non-Gaussianity, we find that the power spectrum provides strong constraints on the non-Gaussianity f_nl parameter, which complement the stringent constraints on the power spectrum normalization, σ_8, from the number counts. To quantify the joint constraints on theese two parameters, that specify the timing of structure formation for a fixed background expansion, we define the figure-of-merit FoM_SFT = (det[Cov(sigma_8,f_nl)])^{-1/2}. We find that our surveys constrain deviations from Gaussianity with a precision of Δf_nl~10 at 1 σconfidence level, with FoM_SFT~39. We point out that constraints on f_nl are weakly sensitive to the uncertainties in the knowledge of nuisance parameters. As an application of non-Gaussian constraints from available data, we analyse the impact of positive skewness on the occurrence of XMMU-J2235, a massive distant cluster discovered at z~1.4. We confirm that in a WMAP-7 Gaussian Lambda CDM cosmology, within the survey volume, ~5x10^{-3} objects like this are expected to be found: to increase this probability by a factor of at least 10, one needs to evade either the available constraints on f_nl or sigma_8.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.