Paper detail

The potential of sparse photometric data in asteroid shape modeling

We investigate the potential of the sparse data produced by the Catalina Sky Survey astrometric project (CSS for short) in asteroid shape and rotational state determination by the lightcurve inversion method. We show that although the photometric quality of the CSS data, compared to the dense data, is significantly worse, it is in principle possible that these data are for some asteroids with high lightcurve amplitudes sufficient for a unique shape determination. CSS data are available for $\sim$180 asteroids for which shape models were previously derived from different photometric data sets. For 13 asteroids from this sample, we derive their unique shape models based only on CSS data, compare the two independent shape models together and discuss the reliability of models derived from only CSS data. We also use CSS data to determine shape models for asteroids with already known rotational period values, derive 12 unique models and compare previously published periods with periods determined from the full 3D modeling by the lightcurve inversion method. Finally, we test different shape resolutions used in the lightcurve inversion method in order to find reliable asteroid models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.