Paper detail

The Posterior Distribution of sin(i) Values For Exoplanets With M_T sin(i) Determined From Radial Velocity Data

Radial velocity (RV) observations of an exoplanet system giving a value of M_T sin(i) condition (i.e. give information about) not only the planet's true mass M_T but also the value of sin(i) (where i is the orbital inclination angle). Thus the value of sin(i) for a system with any particular observed value of M_T sin(i) cannot be assumed to be drawn randomly from a uniform distribution between zero and unity (corresponding to an isotropic i distribution). The actual distribution from which it is drawn depends on the intrinsic distribution of M_T for the exoplanet population being studied. We give a simple Bayesian derivation of this relationship and apply it to several "toy models" for the (currently unknown) intrinsic distribution of M_T. The results show that the effect can be an important one. For example, even for simple power-law distributions of M_T, the median value of sin(i) in an observed RV sample can vary between 0.25 and 0.71 (as compared to the 0.5 value for an isotropic i distribution) for indices of the power-law in the quite plausible range between -2 and -0.5, respectively. Over the same range of indicies, the 95% confidence upper bound on M_T ranges from 4.5 to 400 times larger than M_T sin(i), respectively, due to sin(i) uncertainty alone. More complex, but still simple and plausible, distributions of M_T yield still more complicated and less intuitive $sin(i)$ distributions. In particular, if the M_T distribution contains any characteristic mass scale M_c, the sin(i) distribution will depend on the ratio of M_T sin(i) to $M_c$, often in a non-trivial way. Our qualitative conclusion is that RV studies of exoplanets, both individual objects and statistical samples, should regard the sin(i) factor as more than a "numerical constant of order unity" with simple and well understood statistical properties. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.