Paper detail

The Population of Giant Clumps in Simulated High-z Galaxies: In-situ and Ex-situ, Migration and Survival

We study the properties of giant clumps and their radial gradients in high-$z$ disc galaxies using AMR cosmological simulations. Our sample consists of 770 snapshots in the redshift range $z=4-1$ from 29 galaxies that at $z=2$ span the stellar mass range $(0.2-3)\times 10^{11}M_{\odot}$. Extended gas discs exist in 83% of the snapshots. Clumps are identified by gas density in 3D and their stellar and dark matter components are considered thereafter. While most of the overdensities are diffuse and elongated, 91% of their mass and 83% of their star-fromation rate (SFR) are in compact round clumps. Nearly all galaxies have a central, massive bulge clump, while 70% of the discs show off-center clumps, 3-4 per galaxy. The fraction of clumpy discs peaks at intermediate disc masses. Clumps are divided based on dark-matter content into $\textit{in-situ}$ and $\textit{ex-situ}$, originating from violent disc instability (VDI) and minor mergers respectively. 60% of the discs are in a VDI phase showing off-center $\textit{in-situ}$ clumps, which contribute 1-7% of the disc mass and 5-45% of its SFR. The $\textit{in-situ}$ clumps constitute 75% of the off-center clumps in terms of number and SFR but only half the mass, each clump containing on average 1% of the disc mass and 6% of its SFR. They have young stellar ages, $100-400 {\rm Myr}$, and high specific SFR (sSFR), $1-10 {\rm Gyr}^{-1}$. They exhibit gradients resulting from inward clump migration, where the inner clumps are somewhat more massive and older, with lower gas fraction and sSFR and higher metallicity. Similar observed gradients indicate that clumps survive outflows. The \exsitu clumps have stellar ages $0.5-3 {\rm Gyr}$ and sSFR $\sim 0.1-2 {\rm Gyr}^{-1}$, and they exhibit weaker gradients. Massive clumps of old stars at large radii are likely \exsitu mergers, though half of them share the disc rotation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.