Paper detail

The Population of Galaxies that Contribute to The HI Mass Function

We look at the contribution of different galaxy populations to the atomic hydrogen (HI) mass function (HIMF) and the HI density parameter, $Ω_{\text{HI}}$, in the local Universe. Our analysis is based on a sample of 7857 HI-selected galaxies selected from a volume common to the SDSS and ALFALFA surveys (40$\%$ catalog -- $α.40$). We define different populations of galaxies in the color(u-r)-magnitude($M_{\text{r}}$) plane and compute the HIMF for each of them. Additionally we compute the HIMF for dark galaxies; these are undetected in SDSS and represent $\sim 2\%$ of the total sample. We find that the luminous red population dominates the total HIMF for $\log_{10}(M_{\text{HI}}h^2_{70}/M_{\odot}) \geq 10.4$. The full red population -- luminous and faint -- represents about $\sim 17\%$ of the $Ω_{\text{HI}}$ budget, while that of the dark population is $\sim 3\%$. The HIMF about the knee, $\log_{10}(M_{\text{HI}}h^2_{70}/M_{\odot}) \in [8,10.4]$, is dominated by the faint and luminous blue populations, the latter dominating at larger masses in this interval. Their total contribution to $Ω_{\text{HI}}$ is $\sim 55-70\%$, the variation depending on the definition of population. The dominant populations at the low mass end, $\log_{10}(M_{\text{HI}}h^2_{70}/M_{\odot}) \leq 8.0$ are the faint blue and faint bluer populations, the latter's dominance being sensitive to its definition. The full blue (blue--bluer luminous and faint) population represents $\sim 80\%$ of $Ω_{\text{HI}}$. A bimodal HIMF suggested by our results is however not seen since the amplitude of the HIMF of the luminous red population is small compared to that of the luminous blue population.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.