Paper detail

The polytropic approximation and X-ray scaling relations: constraints on gas and dark matter profiles for galaxy groups and clusters

We constrain gas and dark matter (DM) parameters of galaxy groups and clusters, by comparing X-ray scaling relations to theoretical expectations, obtained assuming that the gas is in hydrostatic equilibrium with the DM and follows a polytropic relation. We vary four parameters: the gas polytropic index Gamma, its temperature at large radii T_xi, the DM logarithmic slope at large radii zeta and its concentration c_vir. When comparing the model to the observed mass-temperature (M-T) relation of local clusters, our results are independent of both T_xi and c_vir. We thus obtain constraints on Gamma, by fixing the DM profile, and on zeta, by fixing the gas profile. For an NFW DM profile, we find that 6/5<Gamma<13/10, which is consistent with numerical simulations and observations of individual clusters. Taking 6/5<Gamma<13/10 allows the DM profile to be slightly steeper than the NFW profile at large radii. Upon including local groups, we constrain the mass-dependence of Gamma and the value of T_xi. Interestingly, with Gamma=6/5 and zeta=-3, we reproduce the observed steepening/breaking of the M-T relation at low M, if 10^6 K<T_xi<10^7 K, consistent with simulations and observations of the warm-hot intergalactic medium. When extrapolated to high redshift z, the model with a constant Gamma reproduces the expected self-similar behaviour. We also account for the observed, non-self-similar relations provided by some high-z clusters, as they provide constraints on the evolution of Gamma. Comparing our model to the observed luminosity-temperature relation, we discriminate between different M-c_vir relations: a weak dependence of c_vir on M is currently preferred by data. This simple theoretical model accounts for much of the complexity of recent, improved X-ray scaling relations, provided that we allow for a mild dependence of Gamma on M or for T_xi consistent with intercluster values. [abridged]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.