Paper detail

The PNe and H II regions in NGC 6822 revisited. Clues to AGB nucleosynthesis

(Abridged) The chemical behaviour of an ample sample of PNe in NGC6822 is analyzed. Spectrophotometric data of 11 PNe and two H II regions were obtained with the OSIRIS spectrograph attached to the Gran Telescopio Canarias. Data for other 13 PNe and three H II regions were retrieved from the literature. Physical conditions and chemical abundances of O, N, Ne, Ar and S were derived for 19 PNe and 4 H II regions. Abundances in the PNe sample are widely distributed showing 12+log(O/H) from 7.4 to 8.2 and 12+log(Ar/H) from 4.97 to 5.80. Two groups of PNe can be differentiated: one old, with low metallicity (12+log(O/H)<8.0 and 12+log(Ar/H)<5.7) and another younger with metallicities similar to the values of H II regions. The old objects are distributed in a larger volume than the young ones. An important fraction of PNe (>30%) was found to be highly N-rich (Type I PNe). Such PNe occur at any metallicity. In addition, about 60% of the sample presents high ionization (He++/He >= 0.1), possessing a central star with effective temperature larger than 10^6 K. Possible biases in the sample are discussed. From comparison with stellar evolution models by A. Karakas's group of the observed N/O abundance ratios, our PNe should have had initial masses lower than 4 M_sun, although if the comparison is made with Ne vs. O abundances, the initial masses should have been lower than 2 M_sun. It appears that these models of stars of 2-3 M_sun are producing too much 22Ne in the stellar surface at the end of the AGB. On the other hand, the comparison with another set of stellar evolution models by P. Ventura's group with a different treatment of convection and on the assumptions concerning the overshoot of the convective core during the core H-burning phase, provided a reasonable agreement between N/O and Ne/H observed and predicted ratios if initial masses of more massive stars are of about 4 M_sun.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.