Paper detail

The Plerionic Supernova Remnant G21.5-0.9 Powered by PSR J1833-1034: New Spectroscopic and Imaging Results Revealed with the Chandra X-ray Observatory

(Abridged) In 1999, Chandra revealed a 150"-radius X-ray halo surrounding the 40"-radius PWN G21.5-0.9. A 2005 imaging study showed that the halo is limb-brightened, and suggested this feature is a candidate for the long-sought SNR shell. We present a spectral analysis of G21.5-0.9, using the longest effective observation to date (578.6 ks with ACIS, 278.4 ks with HRC) to study unresolved questions about the spectral nature of remnant features, such as the limb-brightening of the X-ray halo and the bright knot in the northern part of the halo. The Chandra analysis favours the non-thermal interpretation of the limb. Its spectrum is well fit with a power-law model with a photon index $Γ$ = 2.13 (1.94-2.33) and a luminosity of L_x (0.5-8 keV) = (2.3 +/- 0.6) x 10^33 erg/s (at an assumed distance of 5.0 kpc). An srcut model was also used to fit the spectrum between radio and X-ray energies. We find that the maximum energy to which electrons are accelerated at the shock ranges from ~60-130 TeV (B/10$μ$G)^(-1/2), where B is the magnetic field in units of $μ$G. For the northern knot, we constrain previous models and find that a two-component power-law (or srcut) + pshock model provides an adequate fit, with the pshock model requiring a very low ionization timescale and solar abundances for Mg and Si. Our spectroscopic study of J1833-1034, the highly energetic pulsar powering G21.5-0.9, shows that its spectrum is dominated by hard non-thermal X-ray emission with some evidence of a thermal component that represents ~9% of the observed non-thermal emission and that suggests non-standard rapid cooling of the neutron star. Finally, the ACIS and HRC-I images provide the first evidence for variability in the PWN, a property observed in other PWNe such as the Crab and Vela.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.