Paper detail

The Planetary Nebula in the 500 Myr old Open Cluster M37

We report confirmation of a large, evolved, bipolar planetary nebula and its blue, white dwarf central star as a member of the ~500 Myr old Galactic open star cluster M37 (NGC 2099). This is only the third known example of a planetary nebula in a Galactic open cluster and was found via our on-going program of identifying and studying planetary nebulae - open cluster associations. High confidence in the association comes from the consistent radial velocities and proper motions for the confirmed central star and cluster stars from Gaia, reddening agreement and location of the planetary nebula well within the tidal cluster boundary. Interestingly, all three Galactic examples have bipolar morphology and likely Type I chemistry, both characteristics of higher mass progenitors. In this case the progenitor star mass is in the mid-range of ~2.8 Msun. It provides a valuable, additional point on the key stellar initial-to-final mass relation independent of cluster white dwarf estimates and also falls in a gap in the poorly sampled mass region. This planetary nebula also appears to have the largest kinematical age ever determined and implies increased visibility lifetimes when they are located in clusters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.