Paper detail

The Planck-ATCA Co-eval Observations (PACO) project: the spectrally-selected sample

The Planck-ATCA Co-eval Observations (PACO) have provided multi-frequency (5-40 GHz) flux density measurements of complete samples of Australia Telescope 20 GHz (AT20G) radio sources at frequencies below and overlapping with Planck frequency bands, almost simultaneously with Planck observations. In this work we analyse the data in total intensity for the spectrally-selected PACO sample, a complete sample of 69 sources brighter than 200 mJy at 20 GHz selected from the AT20G survey catalogue to be inverted or upturning between 5 and 20 GHz. We study the spectral behaviour and variability of the sample. We use the variability between AT20G (2004-2007) and PACO (2009-2010) epochs to discriminate between candidate High Frequency Peakers (HFPs) and candidate blazars. The HFPs picked up by our selection criteria have spectral peaks > 10 GHz in the observer frame and turn out to be rare (<0.5% of the S >200 mJy sources), consistent with the short duration of this phase implied by the `youth&#39; scenario. Most (~ 89 %) of blazar candidates have remarkably smooth spectra, well described by a double power-law, suggesting that the emission in the PACO frequency range is dominated by a single emitting region. Sources with peaked PACO spectra show a decrease of the peak frequency with time at a mean rate of -3 +- 2 GHz/yr on an average timescale of τ= 2.1 +- 0.5 yr. The 5-20 GHz spectral indices show a systematic decrease from AT20G to PACO observations. At higher frequencies spectral indices steepen: the median α30-40 GHz is steeper than the median α5-20 GHz by δα= 0.6. Taking further into account the WISE data we find that the SEDs, νS(ν), of most of our blazars peak at ν_p <10^5 GHz; the median peak wavelength is λ_p ~93 μm. Only 6 have ν_p>10^5 GHz.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.