Paper detail

The Picard integral formulation of weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes

High-order temporal discretizations for hyperbolic conservation laws have historically been formulated as either a method of lines (MOL) or a Lax-Wendroff method. In the MOL viewpoint, the partial differential equation is treated as a large system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), where an ODE tailored time-integrator is applied. In contrast, Lax-Wendroff discretizations immediately convert Taylor series in time to discrete spatial derivatives. In this work, we propose the Picard integral formulation (PIF), which is based on the method of modified fluxes, and is used to derive new Taylor and Runge-Kutta (RK) methods. In particular, we construct a new class of conservative finite difference methods by applying WENO reconstructions to the so-called "time-averaged" fluxes. Our schemes are automatically conservative under any modification of the fluxes, which is attributed to the fact that classical WENO reconstructions conserve mass when coupled with forward Euler time steps. The proposed Lax-Wendroff discretization is constructed by taking Taylor series of the flux function as opposed to Taylor series of the conserved variables. The RK discretization differs from classical MOL formulations because we apply WENO reconstructions to time-averaged fluxes rather than taking linear combinations of spatial derivatives of the flux. In both cases, we only need one projection onto the characteristic variables per time step. The PIF is generic, and lends itself to a multitude of options for further investigation. At present, we present two canonical examples: one based on Taylor, and the other based on the classical RK method. Stability analyses are presented for each method. The proposed schemes are applied to hyperbolic conservation laws in one- and two-dimensions and the results are in good agreement with current state of the art methods.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.