Paper detail

The Physics of Protoneutron Star Winds: Implications for r-Process Nucleosynthesis

We solve the general-relativistic steady-state eigenvalue problem of neutrino-driven protoneutron star winds, which immediately follow core-collapse supernova explosions. We provide velocity, density, temperature, and composition profiles and explore the systematics and structures generic to such a wind for a variety of protoneutron star characteristics. Furthermore, we derive the entropy, dynamical timescale, and neutron-to-seed ratio in the general relativistic framework essential in assessing this site as a candidate for $r$-process nucleosynthesis. Generally, we find that for a given mass outflow rate ($\dot{M}$), the dynamical timescale of the wind is significantly shorter than previously thought. We argue against the existence or viability of a high entropy ($\gtrsim300$ per k$_{B}$ per baryon), long dynamical timescale $r$-process epoch. In support of this conclusion, we model the protoneutron star cooling phase, calculate nucleosynthetic yields in our steady-state profiles, and estimate the integrated mass loss. We find that transonic winds enter a high entropy phase only with very low $\dot{M}$ ($\lesssim1\times10^{-9}$ M$_\odot$ s$^{-1}$) and extremely long dynamical timescale ($τ_ρ\gtrsim0.5$ seconds). Our results support the possible existence of an early $r$-process epoch at modest entropy ($\sim150$) and very short dynamical timescale, consistent in our calculations with a very massive or very compact protoneutron star that contracts rapidly after the preceding supernova. We explore possible modifications to our models, which might yield significant $r$-process nucleosynthesis generically. Finally, we speculate on the effect of fallback and shocks on both the wind physics and nucleosynthesis.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.