Paper detail

The Physical Properties of High-Mass Star-Forming Clumps: A Systematic Comparison of Molecular Tracers

We present observations of HCO+ and H^13CO+, N2H+, HCS+, HCN and HN^13C, SO and ^34SO, CCH, SO_2, and CH_3OH-E towards a sample of 27 high-mass clumps coincident with water maser emission. All transitions are observed with or convolved to nearly identical resolution (30"), allowing for inter-comparison of the clump properties derived from the mapped transitions. We find N2H+ emission is spatially differentiated compared to the dust and the other molecules towards a few very luminous cores (10 of 27) and the N2H+ integrated intensity does not correlate well with dust continuum flux. We calculate the effective excitation density, n_eff, the density required to excite a 1 K line in T_kin=20 K gas for each molecular tracer. The intensity of molecular tracers with larger effective excitation densities (n_eff > 10^5 cm^-3) appear to correlate more strongly with the submillimeter dust continuum intensity. The median sizes of the clumps are anti-correlated with the n_eff of the tracers (which span more than three orders of magnitude). Virial mass is not correlated with n_eff, especially where the lines are optically thick as the linewidths may be broadened significantly by non-virial motions. The median mass surface density and median volume density of the clumps is correlated with n_eff indicating the importance of understanding the excitation conditions of the molecular tracer when deriving the average properties of an ensemble of cores.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.