Paper detail

The Physical Effects of Progenitor Rotation: Comparing Two Long-Duration 3D Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations

We analyse and determine the effects of modest progenitor rotation in the context of core-collapse supernovae by comparing two separate long-duration three-dimensional simulations of 9 M$_{\odot}$ progenitors, one rotating with an initial spin period of $\sim$60 seconds and the other non-rotating. We determine that both models explode early, though the rotating model explodes a bit earlier. Despite this difference, the asymptotic explosion energies ($\sim$10$^{50}$ ergs) and residual neutron star baryon masses ($\sim$1.3 M$_{\odot}$) are similar. We find that the proto-neutron star (PNS) core can deleptonize and cool significantly more quickly. Soon into the evolution of the rotating model, we witness more vigorous and extended PNS core convection that early in its evolution envelopes the entire inner sphere, not just a shell. Moreover, we see a corresponding excursion in both the $ν_e$ luminosity and gravitational-wave strain that may be diagnostic of this observed dramatic phenomenon. In addition, after bounce the innermost region of the rotating model seems to execute meridional circulation. The rotationally-induced growth of the convective PNS region may facilitate the growth of core B-fields by the dynamo mechanism by facilitating the achievement of the critical Rossby number condition for substantial growth of a dipole field, obviating the need for rapid rotation rates to create dipole fields of significance. The next step is to explore the progenitor-mass and spin dependencies across the progenitor continuum of the supernova explosion, dynamics, and evolution of PNS convection and its potential role in the generation of magnetar and pulsar magnetic fields.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.