Paper detail

The physical drivers of the atomic hydrogen-halo mass relation

We use SHARK, a semi-analytic galaxy formation model, to investigate the physical processes involved in dictating the shape, scatter and evolution of the HI-halo mass relation at $0\leq z \leq 2$. We compare SHARK with HI clustering and spectral stacking of the HI-halo mass relation derived from observations finding excellent agreement with the former and a deficiency of HI in SHARK at $M_{\rm vir}\approx 10^{12-13} M_{\odot}$ in the latter, but otherwise great agreement below and above that mass threshold. In SHARK, we find that the HI mass increases with the halo mass up to a critical mass of $\approx 10^{11.8} M_{\odot}$; between $\sim 10^{11.8}-10^{13}M_{\odot}$, the scatter in the relation increases by 0.7 dex and the HI mass decreases with the halo mass on average; at $M_{\rm vir} \geq 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, the HI content continues to increase with halo mass. We find that the critical halo mass of $\approx 10^{12} M_{\odot}$ is largely set by feedback from Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), and the exact shape and scatter of the HI-halo mass relation around that mass is extremely sensitive to how AGN feedback is modelled, with other physical processes playing a less significant role. We determine the main secondary parameters responsible for the scatter of the HI-halo mass relation, namely the halo spin parameter at $M_{\rm vir}\leq 10^{11.8} M_{\odot}$, and the fractional contribution from substructure to the total halo mass for $M_{\rm vir}\geq 10^{13} M_{\odot}$. The scatter at $10^{11.8}<M_{\rm vir}<10^{13} M_{\odot}$ is best described by the black-hole-to-stellar mass ratio of the central galaxy, reflecting the AGN feedback relevance. We present a numerical model to populate dark matter-only simulations with HI at $0\leq z \leq 2$ based solely on halo parameters that are measurable in such simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.