Paper detail

The performance of phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo on the ground state electronic energy of benzene

The ground state electronic energy of benzene is the focus of a recent blind test by Eriksen and co-workers [arXiv:2008.02678]. In this note, we report the phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) results on the identical problem. We examine trial wavefunctions of the spin-restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF), and complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) with an active space of 6-electron and 6-orbital (i.e., CAS(6,6)) form for the cc-pVDZ basis set. ph-AFQMC+RHF deviates from the value where many methods agreed on (i.e., -863 m$E_h$) by -3.1(3) m$E_h$ whereas ph-AFQMC+CAS(6,6) deviates from the same value by -1.3(4) m$E_h$. In addition to this, we report the frozen core correlation energy of ph-AFQMC+RHF in the cc-pVTZ and cc-pVQZ basis sets as well as their complete basis set limit. Our findings highlight the accuracy, flexibility, and scalability of ph-AFQMC with simple trial wavefunctions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.