Paper detail

The Penrose dodecahedron and the Witting polytope are identical in CP(3)

It is demonstrated that the set of 40 states of a spin-3/2 particle used by Zimba and Penrose to give proofs of the Kochen-Specker and Bell theorems is identical (i.e., unitarily equivalent) in CP(3) to the set of 40 rays derived from the vertices of the Witting polytope, which is a regular complex polytope in C(4). The Witting polytope actually has two different apparitions in projective spaces of different dimensions: it appears in CP(3) as the Penrose dodecahedron and in RP(7) (after an initial inflation into R(8)) as a set of rays associated with the root vectors of the Lie algebra E8. The interest of these apparitions is that they provide proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem, but of very different types: while the proofs provided by the Penrose dodecahedron are complex (in both senses of the word), those provided by the E8 system are real and easy to grasp (being parity proofs that take no more than simple counting to verify). The different proofs it provides in different settings would seem to justify calling the Witting polytope a "quantum chameleon", and we raise (but leave unanswered) the question of whether it is the only object of this type.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.