Paper detail

The Penalty in Scaling Exponent for Polar Codes is Analytically Approximated by the Golden Ratio

The polarization process of conventional polar codes in binary erasure channel (BEC) is recast to the Domany-Kinzel cellular automaton model of directed percolation in a tilted square lattice. Consequently, the former's scaling exponent, $μ$, can be analogously expressed as the inverse of the percolation critical exponent, $β$. Relying on the vast percolation theory literature and the best known numerical estimate for $β$, the scaling exponent can be easily estimated as $μ_{\text{num}}^{\text{perc}}\simeq1/0.276486(8)\simeq3.617$, which is only about $0.25\%$ away from the known exponent computation from coding theory literature based on numerical approximation, $μ_{\text{num}}\simeq3.627$. Remarkably, this numerical result for the critical exponent, $β$, can be analytically approximated (within only $0.028\%$) leading to the closed-form expression for the scaling exponent $μ\simeq2+φ=2+1.618\ldots\simeq3.618$, where $φ\triangleq(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ is the ubiquitous golden ratio. As the ultimate achievable scaling exponent is quadratic, this implies that the penalty for polar codes in BEC, in terms of the scaling exponent, can be very well estimated by the golden ratio, $φ$, itself.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.