Paper detail

The peculiar Ca-rich SN 2019ehk: Evidence for a Type IIb core-collapse supernova from a low mass stripped progenitor

The nature of the peculiar `Ca-rich' SN 2019ehk in the nearby galaxy M100 remains unclear. Its origin has been debated as either a stripped core-collapse supernova or a thermonuclear helium detonation event. Here, we present very late-time photometry of the transient obtained with the Keck I telescope at $\approx280$ days from peak light. Using the photometry to perform accurate flux calibration of a contemporaneous nebular phase spectrum, we measure an [O I] luminosity of $(0.19-1.08)\times10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and [Ca II] luminosity of $(2.7-15.6)\times10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$ over the range of the uncertain extinction along the line of sight. We use these measurements to derive lower limits on the synthesized oxygen mass of $\approx0.004-0.069$ M$_\odot$. The oxygen mass is a sensitive tracer of the progenitor mass for core-collapse supernovae, and our estimate is consistent with explosions of very low mass CO cores of $1.45-1.5$ M$_\odot$, corresponding to He core masses of $\approx1.8-2.0$ M$_\odot$. We present high quality peak light optical spectra of the transient and highlight features of hydrogen in both the early (`flash') and photospheric phase spectra, that suggest the presence of $\gtrsim0.02$ M$_\odot$ of hydrogen in the progenitor at the time of explosion. The presence of H, together with the large [Ca II]/[O I] ratio ($\approx10-15$) in the nebular phase is consistent with SN 2019ehk being a Type IIb core-collapse supernova from a stripped low mass ($\approx9-9.5$ M$_\odot$) progenitor, similar to the Ca-rich SN IIb iPTF 15eqv. These results provide evidence for a likely class of `Ca-rich' core-collapse supernovae from stripped low mass progenitors in star forming environments, distinct from the thermonuclear Ca-rich gap transients in old environments.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.