Paper detail

The parametric Frobenius problem and parametric exclusion

The Frobenius number of relatively prime positive integers $a_1, \ldots, a_n$ is the largest integer that is not a nononegative integer combination of the $a_i.$ Given positive integers $a_1, \ldots, a_n$ with $n \ge 2,$ the set of multiples of $\gcd(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ which have less than $m$ distinct representations as a nonnegative integer combination of the $a_i$ is bounded above, so we define $f_{m, \ell}(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ to be the $\ell^{\text{th}}$ largest multiple of $\gcd(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ with less than $m$ distinct representations (which generalizes the Frobenius number) and $g_m(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ to be the number of positive multiples of $\gcd(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ with less than $m$ distinct representations. In the parametric Frobenius problem, the arguments are polynomials. Let $P_1, \ldots, P_n$ be integer valued polynomials of one variable which are eventually positive. We prove that $f_{m, \ell}(P_1(t), \ldots, P_n(t))$ and $g_m(P_1(t), \ldots, P_n(t)),$ as functions of $t,$ are eventually quasi-polynomial. A function $h$ is eventually quasi-polynomial if there exist $d$ and polynomials $R_0, \ldots, R_{d-1}$ such that for such that for sufficiently large integers $t,$ $h(t)=R_{t \pmod{d}}(t).$ We do so by formulating a type of parametric problem that generalizes the parametric Frobenius Problem, which we call a parametric exclusion problem. We prove that the $\ell^{\text{th}}$ largest value of some polynomial objective function, with multiplicity, for a parametric exclusion problem and the size of its feasible set are eventually quasi-polynomial functions of $t.$

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.