Paper detail

The parallelism between galaxy clusters and early-type galaxies: II. Clues on the origin of the scaling relations

Context. This is the second work dedicated to the observed parallelism between galaxy clusters and early-type galaxies. The focus is on the distribution of these systems in the scaling relations (SRs) observed when effective radii, effective surface brightness, total luminosities and velocity dispersions are mutually correlated. Aims. Using the data of the Illustris simulation we try to speculate on the origin of the observed SRs. Methods. We compare the observational SRs extracted from the database of the WIde-field Nearby Galaxy-cluster Survey (WINGS) with the relevant parameters coming from the Illustris simulations. Then we use the simulated data at different redshift to infer the evolution of the SRs. Results. The comparison demonstrate that galaxy clusters (GCs) at z~0 follow the same log(L)-log(sigma) relation of early-type galaxies (ETGs) and that both in the log(Ie)-log(Re) and log(Re)-log(M*) planes the distribution of GCs is along the sequence defined by the brightest and massive early-type galaxies (BCGs). The Illustris simulation reproduces the tails of the massive galaxies visible both in the log(Ie)-log(Re) and log(Re)-log(M*) planes, but fail to give the correct estimate of the effective radii of the dwarf galaxies that appear too large and those of GCs that are too small. The evolution of the SRs up to z=4 permits to reveal the complex evolutionary paths of galaxies in the SRs and indicate that the line marking the Zone of Exclusion (ZoE), visible both in the log(Ie)-log(Re) and log(Re)-log(M*) planes, is the trend followed by virialized and passively evolving systems. Conclusions. We speculate that the observed SRs originate from the intersection of the virial theorem and a relation L=L_0 x sigma^beta where the luminosities depend on the star formation history.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.