Paper detail

The Origins of Blue Stragglers and Binarity in Globular Clusters

(abridged) We use newly available empirical binary fractions for globular clusters to carry out a direct test of the binary evolution hypothesis, and of collisional channels that involve binary stars. More specifically, using the previously reported correlation between blue straggler numbers and core mass as a benchmark, we test for correlations with the number of binary stars, as well as with the rates of single-single, single-binary, and binary-binary encounters. Surprisingly, we find that the simple correlation with core mass remains by far the strongest predictor of blue straggler population size, even in our joint models. This is despite the fact that the binary fractions themselves strongly anti-correlate with core mass, just as expected in the binary evolution model. At first sight, these results do not fit neatly with either binary evolution or collisional models in their simplest forms. Arguably the simplest and most intriguing possibility to explain this unexpected result is that observational errors on the core binary fractions are larger than the true intrinsic dispersion associated with their dependence on core mass. In the context of the binary evolution model, this would explain why the combination of binary fraction and core mass is a poorer predictor of blue straggler numbers than core mass alone. It would also imply that core mass is a remarkably clean predictor of core binary fractions. This would be of considerable importance for the dynamical evolution of globular clusters, and provides an important benchmark for models attempting to understand their present-day properties.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.