Paper detail

The Origin of Dust in Early-Type Galaxies and Implications for Accretion onto Supermassive Black Holes

We have conducted an archival Spitzer study of 38 early-type galaxies (ETGs) in order to determine the origin of the dust in approximately half of this population. Our sample galaxies generally have good wavelength coverage from 3.6um to 160um, as well as visible-wavelength HST images. We use the Spitzer data to estimate dust masses, or establish upper limits, and find that all of the ETGs with dust lanes in the HST data are detected in all of the Spitzer bands and have dust masses of ~10^{5-6.5} Msun, while galaxies without dust lanes are not detected at 70um and 160um and typically have <10^5 Msun of dust. The apparently dust-free galaxies do have 24um emission that scales with the shorter wavelength flux, yet substantially exceeds the expectations of photospheric emission by approximately a factor of three. We conclude this emission is dominated by hot, circumstellar dust around evolved stars that does not survive to form a substantial interstellar component. The order of magnitude variations in dust masses between galaxies with similar stellar populations rules out a subtantial contribution from continual, internal production in spite of the clear evidence for circumstellar dust. We demonstrate that the interstellar dust is not due to purely external accretion, unless the product of the merger rate of dusty satellites and the dust lifetime is at least an order of magnitude higher than expected. We propose that dust in ETGs is seeded by external accretion, yet the accreted dust is maintained by continued growth in externally-accreted cold gas beyond the nominal lifetime of individual grains. The several Gyr depletion time of the cold gas is long enough to reconcile the fraction of dusty ETGs with the merger rate of gas-rich satellites. As the majority of dusty ETGs are also low-luminosity AGN and likely fueled by this cold gas, their lifetime should similarly be several Gyr.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.