Paper detail

The Origin of Disks and Spheroids in Simulated Galaxies

In the simplest scenario, disk galaxies form predominantly in halos with high angular momentum and quiet recent assembly history, whereas spheroids are the slowly-rotating remnants of repeated merging events. We explore these assumptions using one hundred systems with halo masses similar to that of the Milky Way, identified in a series of cosmological gasdynamical simulations GIMIC. At z=0, the simulated galaxies exhibit a wide variety of morphologies, from dispersion-dominated spheroids to pure disk galaxies. Surprisingly, these morphological features are very poorly correlated with their halo properties: disks form in halos with high and low net spin, and mergers play a negligible role in the formation of spheroid stars, most of which form in-situ. More important to morphology is the coherent alignment of the angular momentum of baryons that accrete over time to form a galaxy. Spheroids tend to form when the spin of newly-accreted gas is misaligned with that of the extant galaxy, leading to the episodic formation of stars with different kinematics that cancel out the net rotation of the system. Disks, on the other hand, form out of gas that flows in with similar angular momentum to that of earlier-accreted material. Gas accretion from a hot corona thus favours disk formation, whereas gas that flows "cold", often along separate, misaligned filaments, favours the formation of spheroids. In this scenario, most spheroids consist of superpositions of stellar components with distinct kinematics, age, and metallicity, an arrangement that might survive to the present day given the paucity of major mergers. Since angular momentum is acquired largely at turnaround, morphology is imprinted early by the interplay of the tidal field and the shape of the material destined to form the galaxy.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.