Paper detail

The Origin of Binary Black Holes Mergers

Recently Venumadhav et al. (2019) proposed a new pipeline to analyze LIGO-Virgo's O1-O2 data and discovered eight new binary black hole (BBH) mergers, including a high effective spin, chi_{eff}, one. This discovery sheds new light on the origin of the observed BBHs and the dynamical capture vs. field binaries debate. Using a new statistical approach, we show that, while isotropic models are not ruled out, the observed chi_{eff} distribution favors field binaries, whose chi_{eff} is determined by tidal forces and wind losses, over capture. However, given the current limited sample size, capture scenarios (isotropic models) cannot be ruled out. Observations of roughly a hundred merges will enable us to distinguish between the different formation scenarios. However, if as expected, both formation channels operate it may be difficult to resolve their exact fraction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.