Paper detail

The orbital velocity anisotropy of cluster galaxies: evolution

In nearby clusters early-type galaxies follow isotropic orbits, while the orbits of late-type galaxies are characterized by slightly radial anisotropy. Little is known about the orbits of the different populations of cluster galaxies at redshift above z~0.3. Here we investigate the redshift evolution of the orbits of cluster galaxies using two samples of galaxy clusters spanning similar (evolutionary corrected) mass ranges at different redshifts. The low-redshift (z~0.0-0.1) sample is extracted from the ENACS catalog and the high-redshift (z~0.4-0.8) sample is mostly made of clusters from the EDisCS. For each of these samples, we solve the Jeans equation for hydrostatic equilibrium separately for two cluster galaxy populations, characterized by the presence and, respectively, absence of emission-lines in their spectra ('ELGs' and 'nELGs' hereafter). Using two tracers of the gravitational potential allows to partially break the well known mass-velocity anisotropy degeneracy. We find no significant evolution for the orbits of ELGs. On the other hand the orbits of nELGs do evolve, from radial to isotropic with time. We speculate that this evolution may be driven by the secular mass growth of galaxy clusters during their fast accretion phase. The mass density profiles of the clusters are well fit by NFW models both in the low-z and in the high-z samples. The best-fit NFW concentrations and their redshift evolution are in agreement with the predictions of Lambda CDM cosmological simulations. The evolution of the number density profile of nELGs is opposite to that of the mass density profile, becoming less concentrated with time, probably a result of the transformation of ELGs into nELGs [abridged].

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.